by Mary Spiller
April 3, 2026
The ruling asserted that there is a requirement to maintain executive authority, and the PRA infringes upon it.
The U.S. Department of Justice has concluded that a key post-Watergate law governing presidential records is unconstitutional, arguing that it places undue limits on executive authority. In a newly disclosed legal opinion, the Department’s Office of Legal Counsel determined that the Presidential Records Act (PRA) exceeds Congress’s authority and improperly interferes with the powers of Donald Trump’s presidency.
The memo, authored by Assistant Attorney General T. Elliot Gaiser, states that the law “aggrandizes the legislative branch” at the expense of the executive branch.
The PRA, enacted in 1978 following the Watergate scandal, requires presidents to preserve official records and transfer them to the National Archives at the end of their term. The law established that such materials belong to the federal government rather than the individual president.
However, the Justice Department’s analysis contends the statute oversteps constitutional boundaries. “The PRA is not a valid exercise of Congress’s Article I authority and unconstitutionally intrudes on the independence and autonomy of the President guaranteed by Article II,” Gaiser wrote. He further described the law as imposing “a permanent and burdensome regime of congressional regulation of the Presidency.”
Based on this interpretation, the opinion concludes that Donald Trump is not obligated to comply with the statute. The decision was made public on April 2, according to CBS News.
The ruling comes after years of legal disputes involving Trump and the handling of presidential records.
In 2023, he faced charges related to allegations that he retained classified materials at his Mar-a-Lago residence after leaving office and did not promptly return them when requested. Trump denied wrongdoing at the time, maintaining that he was permitted to keep the documents under existing law. The case was ultimately dropped following his return to the presidency.
The Presidential Records Act outlines rules for maintaining official communications, including emails, messages, and other materials tied to presidential duties, while excluding documents considered strictly personal. Although the law establishes requirements for preservation and access, it does not include direct enforcement provisions.
While opinions issued by the Office of Legal Counsel are binding within the executive branch, they are not final if challenged in court. A judicial ruling could ultimately determine whether the law remains enforceable.
RELATED CONTENT: Trump Administration Labels Women’s Retreats As ‘Discriminatory’
